69landshark (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Why doesnt the North Tower show any reaction to the 110 story South Tower collapseing rite next to it?What changes in the next hour to initiate the collapse?Fire?These buildings are built fromn the ground up.why would the lower floors be dependant on the upper floors when the lower floors supported the upper 100 floors for decades?why would terrorists send anthrax letters to members of congress and the media?why were we told we are with Bush and company or with the terrorists?

sayzmark (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

zeitgeist.. somebody heard of tat?let stop these and hv a look to this movie=)

PeaceIsRad (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

OH MY GOD!!!It kills me to read the uneducated stupidity from these sleepers. If there's a God, oh how I wish he would come down from the heavens and tell all those close-minded zombie's to WAKE the F@#K UP!!! He'd say, "Snap out of it! I made you smarter than that! Why are you so affraid of the Truth and so fearful of what you call authority. Truth is the Authority, now get your facts straight and make me proud! Don't make me cause a great flood and start all over...sheeesh!!!"

kohhy (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

There are many evidence anyway. One very convicing one is the fact that the debris that was thrown out as the towers collapse could only be possible if there was explosives in the towers. And i am saying all this only becos i have studied all the documents i can get on the WTC collapse and have pieced together what i have just said in my three comments. And if everyone do study, they could find out the truth.

kohhy (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

However, if we are going to use the pancake-theory mention in the video, the WTC towers would take up to 15 sec to COMPLETELY collapse into a pile of debris. In the actaul tower collapse, it took only about 7-10 sec to collapse. In scentific test and experiment, results show the only if explosives were used could the building COMPLETELY collapse in 7-10 secs. If you read up on the net, you can find a lot of evidence of that.

kohhy (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Reading some of the comments here tells me a lot about how you all think that two ordinary fully loaded with fuel boeing 767 could have brought down the WTC towers. Prove from many expert engineers around the world have show us all that there were bombs planned in the WTC that exploded at the same time as the building collapsed. This cause the speed of the towers' collapse to speed up.

shorty1233210 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

you conspirators have no idea what your talking about and you have no life!but to sit here and find a way to blame the government.it was NO conspiracy.just a bunch of idiots who flew planes into 2towers...THATS IT!!!!

shorty1233210 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

for god sakes.the plane took out most of its structuresand when you look at how these trade centers were made, you can see that if one floor collapses...the building is going down like a pancake. the plane took out the basic center of the towers. cause of this, the building is going down without reason.GODD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1the

freidenki (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

everybody knows, steel is a very good conductor of heat. these extraordenary thick steel beams transported a lot of heatenergy from the hot section to colder places, before they locally reached over 500°C. hundrets if not thousands of tons of steel need very much energy and with only kerosin/air at atmospheric pressure you need a long time until you've locally more than 500°C. and even after really hot fires, burning for more than 10 hours, steelconstructions did not collaps.

loccysmif (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Danny Jowenko, for example, said WTC 7 was 'definitely' a controlled demolition, however, he said WTC 1 and 2 were not. I don't see you bring forth honest information such as this. My side likes to point out only his WTC 7 comments. Your side likes to point out only his WTC 1 & 2 comments. However: what is more important? Well duh: his WTC 7 comment ofcourse! Later he said: "If you talk about this you lose your job as a demolition expert". At the very best loizeaux is thinking about his career.